Stay Informed: Get Email from the DSCC
Blog
Print

What They're Saying About Brad Ellsworth



Fri Feb 19 2010 16:10:00 GMT-0500 (EST)  |  by Arjun Jaikumar

What they're saying about Brad Ellsworth in Indiana (it's quite good)...

EVANSVILLE COURIER AND PRESS: FITS THE CENTRIST BILL

“Observers say Ellsworth might best fit the centrist bill.”

http://www.courierpress.com/news/2010/feb/17/ellsworth-gets-early-lead-to-fill-bayh-spot/?print=1

INDY STAR: CONSERVATIVE STANCES “MAKE HIM GOOD FIT FOR ELECTION ENVIRONMENT”

“But several party insiders said Ellsworth may have the edge. His conservative stances -- including anti-abortion and pro-gun views -- may make him a good fit in this election environment. He's also a former sheriff.”

http://www.indystar.com/article/20100218/NEWS05/2180440/Ellsworth-tops-Democrats-Senate-list

POLITICO: ATTRACTIVE RECRUIT

“Ellsworth’s profile offers the Democratic Party an attractive recruit. He represents a conservative-minded southern Indiana district and handily defeated Rep. John Hostettler — one of the prospective Republican Senate candidates — to win his seat in 2006.”

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=D81DA5F6-18FE-70B2-A8DB7F06B81D0D26

CHRIS CILLIZZA: “STAR WRITTEN ON HIM FROM THE START”

“Ellsworth, elected in 2006 to a southern Indiana district, has had "star" written on him since the start.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/senate/the-bayh-decision-winners-and.html

FORMER IN HOUSE SPEAKER JOHN GREGG: VERY SINCERE MAN, DISCTRICT LOVES HIM, DOESN’T TOE PARTY LINE

"He's truly a very sincere man. The district loves him. He doesn't toe the party line. He's available and a listener. He's a conservative Democrat. I think our party would rally round him," Gregg said. "He'd be acceptable to party regulars, independents and moderate -- if there are any left -- Republicans."

http://www.indystar.com/article/20100218/NEWS05/2180440/Ellsworth-tops-Democrats-Senate-list

ROLL CALL: TOPS LIST OF REPLACEMENTS

“Ellsworth Tops List of Replacements for Bayh”

http://www.rollcall.com/news/43304-1.html?type=printer_friendly

REAL CLEAR POLITICS: MODERATE VOTING RECORD, DISTRICT WON BY McCAIN, BUSH

“Democrats floated the names of Reps. Brad Ellsworth and Baron Hill as potential replacements for Bayh. Both have moderate voting records and hail from districts won by both John McCain and George W. Bush, which bodes well for them in a statewide race.”

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/politics_nation/2010/02/indiana_makes_senate_winnable.html

MARC AMBINDER: CUTS A GREAT PROFILE FOR STATE

Ellsworth cuts a great profile for the state -- though he voted for health care reform, he voted against the stimulus package in the House, and voted against cap and trade legislation to boot. Great campaigner, young, attractive guy -- strong on second amendment issues. Popular within the Democratic caucus. Supported by the Democratic establishment.

http://politics.theatlantic.com/2010/02/democrats_coalescing_behind_ellsworth_in_indiana.php


Tags - Indiana

Comments

  • Ellsworth is the wrong choice Mon Feb 22 2010 01:09:53 GMT-0500 (EST)  |  by bepeace
    John Nichols:

    Ellsworth's social conservatism and economic elitism is a toxic combination that has the potential to depress turnout among base Democrats, progressives and populist independents.

    So what will Indiana Democrats get with Brad Ellsworth: An "I'm-more-conservative-than-you-are" election debate that culminates in maximized Republican turnout and depressed Democratic turnout.

    http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat/532330/indiana_dems_need_populist_mellencamp_not_blue_dog_ellsworth

    Reply to Comment Made by bepeace

    Special Member info
    E-Mail:
    ZIP Code:
    Username:
    Subject:
    Comment:
  • That's not all they're saying about Ellsworth Mon Feb 22 2010 16:35:05 GMT-0500 (EST)  |  by Indiana Progressive
    Funny how there's also tons of criticism about Ellsworth out there as well. He's a Blue Dog, who's voted against his party at very crucial and critical times. He's pro-life, pro-gun, anti-gay, and has a mixed record with labor at best.

    He's not in favor of a progressive health care bill, certainly not the public option. He's to the right of Senator Lugar, a Republican, on many of these issues and others.

    The DSCC should try finding a candidate that is more in keeping with Democratic Party values. Ellsworth is not the only candidate who can win and while there may not be as many of them in Indiana as elsewhere, can Ellsworth win the day if progressives stay home?

    Reply to Comment Made by Indiana Progressive

    Special Member info
    E-Mail:
    ZIP Code:
    Username:
    Subject:
    Comment:
  • USW LOCAL 1014 Fri Feb 26 2010 23:28:34 GMT-0500 (EST)  |  by
    Sent to the Post-Tribune and the Times newspapers Feb 24.
    From; WRKPAC THE WORKING MAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

    The Department of Labor has filed a complaint in the U S District court (cause #210CV086) of factual allegations of collusion of US Steel with members of the Union that are active in the Union Reform Team. The charge is use of USS resources to influence the election. Have ���Racketeering��� and Mob influence once again been used to deprive the Union membership of justice negotiated in a Labor Agreement? Many union activists believe US Steel has for many years used covert activities in pursuit of the destruction of the USW and the power the workers have to ensure a safe work environment, fair wages and compliance of labor contracts.
    There are some that will portray this incident as insignificant in an attempt to disguise the despicable intentions and objective of this conspiracy. There are two main groups of this conspiracy. They are US Steel and the Union Reform Team.
    The purpose of US Steel involvement with influencing a Union election is understandable because it is good for business. If the company can reduce its cost to operate and become more profitable by any means it will. If the Company can in any way reduce the resistance of the Union to agree to any cost saving measures it is a good business decision. If the company can violate the Labor Agreement with the knowledge the Union will not act to defend against those violations it is good for business. Corporate greed is after all only Capitalism, which our economy is based on. So, as the charge stands, to compensate the Union Reform Team in various ways for future considerations of the Company���s goal of higher profit was a good investment.
    But the acceptance of compensation knowingly given by the Company to the Union Reform Team has only despicable intent. Personal gain at the cost of the people they promised to represent to the best of their ability is betrayal. Conscious acceptance of unearned wages, bribes, gifts, graft, and gratuities while being fully aware of considerations that will be requested by the Company in the future is treachery.
    The union members of Local 1014 have to ask themselves many questions that arise now that this complicity has been revealed. How many members were not fully represented in matters concerning promotions, grievances, contracting out of work, discipline and overtime equalization because the Union Reform Team members were in debt to the Company? Who lost their job because the Company knew the Union would not fully represent them because of favors owed to the Company? How many Safety issues were overlooked because persons on the JUM Safety Committee were obligated to the Company? How much money did the Company and management funnel into the pockets of the Union Reform Team? How severe is the damage done to the integrity of the USW?
    The members of Local 1014, the USW and every union in the country will be watching to see if Justice and the ���Rule of Law��� shall prevail or have we returned to the era of Jimmy Hoffa when Unions were bought and sold?

    This is an opinion of WRKPAC, a not- for-profit entity.
    Wm. Krebes, USW local 1014 member

    Reply to Comment Made by

    Special Member info
    E-Mail:
    ZIP Code:
    Username:
    Subject:
    Comment:
  • Reply to Post

    Special Member info
    E-Mail:
    ZIP Code:
    Username:
    Subject:
    Comment:
    Contribute

    Feed IconRSS Feeds

    Get a personalized rss feed

    Connect & Share

    Facebook  YouTube Twitter
    Contact Us | Privacy Policy © 2010 Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee
    Paid for by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, http://www.dscc.org, and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.